Ever since I was a kid I’ve loved science fiction.
Until recently, I thought that science fiction = military adventure, post-apocalyptic tale or dystopian warning. I never could have conceived of science fiction that is optimistic, if not perfect, in the future it tries to put forth to an audience.
I understand, who doesn’t love reading a story about space marines on alien worlds? Or about a bombed-out wasteland teeming with bizarre creatures and even weirder people? Or a hellish, totalitarian government that watches everything its citizens do with a paranoid and all-seeing eye (Aren’t we already living that? Heyo! Haha…ha…ha). Still, there should be optimistic sci-fi and it turns out there are alternatives!
Granted, this is a personal discovery and not a moment where I expect to be welcomed as Moses coming down from the mountain with a new revelation.
Ursula K. Le Guin and Kim Stanley Robinson both spring to mind as two titans of science fiction that imagine a positive, almost-utopian future for humanity. Yes, things might not be perfect, but at least we have ventured forth from our home and it hasn’t ended in disaster. It also doesn’t hurt that their political ideologies line up pretty well with my own.
So, why am I talking about this?
I’ve tried my hand at writing literary fiction. And you better believe I’m still insanely proud of In the Land of God. Nevertheless, breaking into the literary fiction scene is pretty damn hard; to say the least. Either your ideas must be so fresh and so innovative that they can’t be ignored OR you have to grind and grind and grind through getting a BA in creative writing, pursuing an MFA and then working your ass off to meet the right people and get your manuscript in the right hands. Of course, much of the same still stands when it comes to sci-fi, except for one big personal difference: I enjoy writing it more. Same goes for horror.
So where does this talk about optimistic sci-fi come in?
A few months ago, I saw this painting online:
I don’t know who painted it, otherwise I’d be more than happy to give them credit. It filled me with warmth and comfort and a feeling of community: the clear and blue skies, the sleek and simple architecture, the abundance of greenery and people walking alongside an electric train. It seems so…simple. Not just in terms of lifestyle, but in terms of solutions to our myriad problems: alienation, the loss of public space, our lack of mass transit (at least here in the US), the destruction of the environment and the reality that (sorry AnPrims) most of us would like to live in a modern society.
I started thinking about a different world, a cleaner world after seeing that picture.
Recently, I wrote a short essay about bikes and why I wish we used them more and could use them more. Unfortunately, where I live, biking more than a mile is recipe for disaster (especially once the snow flies). And I started thinking about a world where taking a bike, or even walking was just as convenient as hopping in a car.
Imagine a world where everything you need is a short walk or bike ride away? And if it’s raining or cold or you just feel like being lazy there’s a solar-powered train a stone’s throw from your home, or maybe instead of cars we drive something like an oversized, solar-powered golf cart?
Imagine a world where vines and beautiful flowers decorate every building instead of obnoxious and glaring advertisements.
Imagine a world where there are plenty of open, public spaces for people to meet and talk and enjoy music and art. And if it’s not a public space then it’s used for growing produce.
Imagine looking up and seeing a blue sky without any manmade objects in it save for a handful of airliners making emergency trips across the country. Imagine knowing you had the time to take a train anywhere you wanted knowing that it wasn’t destroying the atmosphere and you didn’t have to wait for the seat-belt light to turn off before you stood up to go pee.
Imagine…
It’s easy to get bogged down in negativity when it comes to our planet’s future. The IPCC released a dismal report a few months ago and I can summarize it like this: We have 12 years to fix things or we’re screwed. Royally screwed. Laughing-and-crying-in-hysteria screwed.
Climate collapse (and, let’s be honest, that’s what it is) is still regarded by far too many people as a natural phenomenon outside of Man’s control. Those who stand to lose the most due to climate collapse don’t have the power to change the people who make the decisions. Central Americans are already fleeing their homes due to unpredicted droughts and they’re being locked in cages. How long before more refugees arrive at our borders and our ports and they meet a worse fate? How long before we start feeling the squeeze at home? Hotter summers and harsher winters are already becoming the norm, and how long will it be before we start to feel the more dire effects like food shortages and water shortages?
That’s to say nothing about the destruction of biospheres (bye coral reefs, bye forests).
Or to say nothing about impending fuel shortages (I guess the dinosaurs got the last laugh. Use me to mow your lawn, huh?! Watch this!)
Despite all this negativity, I still find myself drawn to imagining both a better future and a worse future. It can go either way, which is why I’ve started tinkering with a novel that is focused on one family split between two parallel realities: one in which climate collapse is averted and one in which the worst happens. One that ends as a success story, and one that ends with us back to square one. I want to write a story that acts as a warning and as an encouragement. I’m not writing it for fame and fortune, instead I’m writing it as catharsis, like having a good dream and a nightmare at once.
I won’t pretend that I’m writing this as some groundbreaking manifesto or work of fiction. I just want it to be something that makes people ask themselves: what kind of world would I rather have?
My novel, In the Land of God, is available as a FREE PDF or as an E-BOOK & PAPERBACK.